Ross Hauser, MD; Danielle Matias, PA-C; Demi Foster, APRN

People who contact us about golfer’s elbow often describe pain on the inside of the elbow that has made working, lifting, gripping, or playing sports increasingly difficult. Some have tried rest, medication, a compression sleeve, physical therapy, or a cortisone injection. Others are worried that persistent pain means they have torn a ligament or will need surgery.

You do not have to play golf to develop this problem. Repetitive hand and forearm loading can affect construction workers, warehouse workers, people using tools, golfers, racquet-sport players, and throwing athletes. The important questions are which structure is painful, whether other nearby problems are present, and what the evidence actually supports.

Golfer’s elbow usually refers to a tendon attachment problem. It is not another name for a torn ulnar collateral ligament, and numbness in the fingers should not automatically be attributed to the tendon. These distinctions become especially important when treatment has not helped.

What is golfer’s elbow?

Golfer’s elbow, also called medial epicondylitis or medial elbow tendinopathy, involves the common flexor-pronator tendon origin at the medial epicondyle—the bony prominence on the inside of the elbow. The attached muscles help bend the wrist, assist gripping, and turn the forearm so the palm faces downward. Repeated loading can produce tendon degeneration and pain at this attachment. (1)

The ending “-itis” suggests inflammation. In persistent cases, however, degeneration and an impaired tendon-repair response may be more useful explanations than inflammation alone. This does not mean that inflammatory signaling is absent from every chronic tendon problem. It means that relieving pain and restoring the tendon’s ability to tolerate load are different goals. Foundational elbow-tendinopathy literature remains relevant to this distinction and to the role of clinical examination and rehabilitation. (2)

The patient concerns we commonly hear

Two recurring situations illustrate why the same location of pain can raise different concerns.

The construction worker who cannot simply stop using the arm

A person who has spent years swinging hammers, doing demolition, carrying materials, or gripping tools may describe burning pain in one or both inner elbows. Compression sleeves and medication may make work possible for a while, but symptoms return. Sleep may become difficult, and the person may worry about relying on repeated cortisone injections.

The useful detail in this story is not simply “overuse.” It is the combination of ongoing load, limited opportunity to rest, and symptoms that may include numbness at night. Numbness deserves its own consideration rather than being assumed to be part of golfer’s elbow.

The pitcher or parent worried about losing a season

A throwing athlete may have been told to rest, then find that pain returns when throwing intensity increases. The athlete or parent wants to know whether an injection could help, whether the UCL is injured, and whether delaying surgery could make matters worse.

Those questions cannot be answered from the label “pitcher’s elbow” alone. A flexor-pronator tendon problem, UCL injury, and ulnar nerve irritation may overlap. Our UCL injury and Tommy John surgery article addresses the ligament-specific questions.

Inner elbow pain: tendon, ligament, or nerve?

Medial elbow pain has a broad differential diagnosis—a list of conditions that can resemble one another. Reviews identify flexor-pronator injury, UCL pathology, ulnar neuritis, and snapping medial triceps among the possibilities. More than one may be present. (3)

Symptom or pattern	What may need to be distinguished
Pain near the inner bony prominence during gripping, wrist bending, or turning the palm down	Common flexor-pronator tendinopathy or a tendon tear
Inner elbow pain during throwing, loss of control, or a sense of instability	UCL injury, with or without tendon involvement
Tingling in the ring and little fingers, especially with the elbow bent	Ulnar nerve irritation or compression
Snapping with elbow bending	A moving ulnar nerve, snapping triceps, or another mechanical problem
Progressive stiffness, grinding, or locking	Arthritis, loose bodies, or other joint pathology

These patterns guide an examination; they do not establish a diagnosis by themselves. For motion loss and degenerative joint changes, see our discussion of elbow osteoarthritis and post-traumatic degeneration.

Physical examination alongside ultrasound or MRI

A scan should support the diagnosis rather than replace the examination. A foundational review stresses understanding elbow anatomy, reproducing the relevant symptoms with examination maneuvers, and considering alternative conditions before relying solely on advanced imaging. (4)

For suspected golfer’s elbow, examination may assess tenderness at the tendon origin, pain with resisted wrist flexion and forearm pronation, grip function, movement, and the nearby ligament and nerve. This is different from assuming that every tender structure requires treatment.

Ultrasound can help evaluate tendon thickening or tearing and, when appropriate, the motion of nearby structures. MRI can help when a larger tear, UCL injury, or another problem is suspected. X-rays may be useful when bone changes or arthritis are a concern. A 2026 review emphasizes that diagnosis is primarily clinical and imaging is used selectively to characterize pathology or exclude alternatives. (5)

An imaging abnormality does not automatically explain every symptom or determine whether an injection or operation will succeed. Conversely, an uncertain scan does not make persistent pain unimportant.

Conservative care: reducing overload while rebuilding capacity

Activity modification, rehabilitation, stretching, and strengthening remain central to nonsurgical care. For a manual worker, reducing exposure may mean changing the most provocative task or grip rather than stopping all work. For a throwing athlete, the distinction between tendon pain and ligament injury matters before resuming high loads. (1)

What the 2026 exercise evidence adds

A 2026 systematic review included five studies involving 143 patients with medial epicondylitis. Eccentric exercise—loading a muscle as it lengthens—was associated with improved pain and function. However, the studies were small, treatment programs differed, and the overall certainty was low. The findings support including progressive exercise in conservative care, without promising that a particular exercise program will resolve every case. (6)

This matters for people who have already tried physical therapy. “Therapy did not work” can describe very different experiences: a short course of passive treatments, exercises that exceeded tolerance, or a reasonable strengthening program that failed because another condition was also present. Persistent symptoms can justify reconsidering the diagnosis as well as the treatment.

Braces, tape, medication, and other modalities

A counterforce strap, wrist support, or tape may make some activities more comfortable. Ice and medication may reduce symptoms temporarily. These measures should be judged by whether they help function; symptom relief does not demonstrate that a tendon or ligament has repaired.

Shockwave treatment, therapeutic ultrasound, electrical modalities, dry needling, and other techniques have been discussed for persistent medial elbow pain. Their evidence and methods vary, and being listed as a treatment option is not proof of a reliable long-term benefit. A medial-elbow review describes several such options while emphasizing that coexisting problems affect treatment choice. (3)

Nitroglycerin patches and botulinum toxin also appear in discussions of tendon treatment. Evidence from other tendon conditions should not be read as establishing these as routine treatments for isolated golfer’s elbow. The same caution applies to borrowing a favorable tennis-elbow trial without acknowledging that it studied the outside of the elbow.

Cortisone: early pain relief and long-term recovery are different outcomes

Some patients tell us that an initial cortisone injection seemed to solve the problem, only for pain to return. A foundational medial-specific trial helps explain why early relief may not last.

In a randomized, double-blind study of 58 patients and 60 elbows, methylprednisolone plus local anesthetic was compared with saline plus local anesthetic; both groups also received physical therapy and anti-inflammatory medication. The steroid group improved more on one pain-grading measure at six weeks, but the groups did not differ in pain at three months or one year. The visual-analog pain measure did not show a group difference at six weeks or one year. The conclusion was short-term benefit rather than sustained superiority. (7)

There are also tissue-related concerns. A review of local corticosteroid use describes experimental evidence of adverse effects on tendon cells, collagen organization, and mechanical properties, as well as reported tendon ruptures. These findings support caution, particularly around repeated exposure, but they do not mean that every injection inevitably causes a rupture or permanent loss of function. (8)

Pain relief does not prove tissue repair. The benefit-risk discussion depends on the drug, injection target, patient, and condition; it should not rest on the blanket claim that every anti-inflammatory treatment prevents healing.

PRP for golfer’s elbow: what is supported?

Platelet-rich plasma, or PRP, is prepared from the patient’s blood to concentrate platelets and associated signaling proteins. Its biological rationale should be distinguished from evidence that it improves a particular diagnosis.

A medial-specific comparison with surgery

A retrospective study compared 15 patients receiving PRP with 18 undergoing surgery for persistent type 1 medial epicondylitis, the category without associated ulnar neuropathy. Successful outcomes were reported in 80% of the PRP group and 94% of the surgical group, with no statistically significant difference. Some recovery measures favored PRP. (9)

This is encouraging but not proof of equivalence. There were only 33 patients, treatment was not randomly assigned, and the study did not include a placebo group. Its findings should not be generalized to people whose symptoms are driven by ulnar neuropathy or a UCL tear.

Why the systematic-review conclusion needs context

A 2022 systematic review found only two comparative studies meeting its criteria for PRP versus surgery in medial epicondylitis. Both reported favorable outcomes. That small evidence base supports further investigation and a discussion of PRP as an option, rather than a claim that it is definitively as effective as surgery for all patients. (10)

Newer mixed elbow evidence does not answer every medial-elbow question

A study published online in 2024 and collected in a 2025 issue retrospectively reviewed 51 adults treated with minimally invasive needle tenotomy or PRP for medial or lateral epicondylitis. Pain improved, but functional questionnaire scores did not improve significantly. Initial MRI severity did not correlate with the measured pain and functional outcomes. Because the population combined elbow diagnoses and treatment was not randomized, the report does not establish a reliable medial-specific success rate or show that MRI is unnecessary. (11)

The practical evidence boundary is that PRP may help selected patients, but results remain uncertain. Different preparations, tendon targets, accompanying care, and study populations complicate comparison. Findings for tennis elbow or UCL injuries belong in their own discussions.

Prolotherapy for golfer’s elbow: clinical rationale and evidence limits

Dextrose Prolotherapy uses an injected solution intended to stimulate a repair response in painful supporting tissues. At Caring Medical, our clinical discussion includes both tendon attachments and nearby ligaments when the history and findings suggest more than one injured structure.

This perspective should not be translated into a claim that most inner elbow pain comes from the annular ligament, which is on the lateral side of the elbow. Nor does a discussion of ligament injury establish that every patient needs ligament injections.

Published Prolotherapy research for the elbow is concentrated on lateral tendinopathy, and it cannot automatically establish effectiveness for isolated medial tendinopathy, an ulnar nerve problem, or a torn UCL. Our updated tennis-elbow article discusses those lateral-elbow trials in detail. The broader medial-elbow literature includes Prolotherapy among possible interventions, but that is different from demonstrating its efficacy in a large controlled medial-specific trial. (3)

What our published 36-patient elbow report found

Our group’s retrospective report followed 36 people with unresolved elbow pain at an outpatient charity clinic. They had experienced pain for approximately four years, and the average follow-up was 31 months after their last treatment. Average reported pain scores decreased from 5.1 to 1.6 and stiffness scores from 3.9 to 1.4. Patients also reported changes in exercise ability, medication use, and other quality-of-life measures. (12)

We retain this study because it is part of our published clinical experience. It was uncontrolled, relied on patient reports, and concerned unresolved elbow pain rather than a rigorously defined isolated golfer’s-elbow group. It cannot determine how much improvement was caused by Prolotherapy or establish a predicted success rate for an individual patient.

What about PRP and Prolotherapy together?

The treatments are sometimes discussed together because they have different preparations and may be directed at different suspected pain sources. The rationale for doing so should not be confused with evidence of added benefit. The studies summarized here do not establish that combining them is superior to either treatment alone for golfer’s elbow.

Videos: preserve the anatomy and clinical learning points

Chronic elbow pain, tendinosis, and ultrasound

Danielle Matias, PA-C, discusses persistent tendon pain and the importance of distinguishing degeneration, fraying, and more substantial tearing. The useful lesson is that a chronic elbow-pain label may need refinement. Ultrasound can contribute information about the tendon; it should be interpreted alongside symptoms and examination.

The Caring Medical elbow-pain study

Ross Hauser, MD, reviews the published elbow-pain report and demonstrates relevant anatomy. The study’s patient-reported improvements are preserved above, together with the limitations of its retrospective, uncontrolled design.

When is surgery considered?

Surgery may be considered for persistent, function-limiting symptoms when the diagnosis is established and appropriate nonsurgical care has not provided adequate relief. A tendon procedure, ulnar nerve operation, and UCL reconstruction address different problems; they should not be presented as interchangeable treatments.

A 2025 systematic review included 17 surgical studies and 442 patients. Most studies were retrospective and reported postoperative improvement, but methods and quality varied. The pooled reported complication rate was 3.1%; this is not an individualized estimate and comparisons between procedures are limited by differences in the patients and studies. (13)

Another review, published in December 2025, included four case series with 105 patients and judged the evidence for surgical management to be limited and generally low quality. Taken together, the reviews suggest that surgery can help selected patients while leaving uncertainty about the best technique and comparative benefit. (14)

Neither these findings nor the PRP studies justify promising a particular return-to-work or return-to-sport date. Persistent pain, nerve symptoms, mechanical problems, and ligament instability need to be interpreted in their own context.

What persistent inner elbow pain should prompt us to reconsider

If symptoms continue, useful questions include whether pain is centered at the tendon origin, whether numbness suggests nerve involvement, whether throwing pain could reflect the UCL, and whether stiffness or locking points toward the joint. A scan result needs to match the symptom pattern.

Our elbow-pain overview links the broader categories. For golfer’s elbow specifically, the central distinction is between reducing symptoms temporarily and restoring useful arm function over time. The evidence supports keeping rehabilitation in the discussion, interpreting injection studies carefully, and avoiding a one-diagnosis explanation for every painful elbow.

When symptoms need prompt medical attention

Seek urgent care for a visibly deformed elbow after an injury, a cold or pale hand, or a hot swollen joint accompanied by fever. New or worsening hand weakness, a sudden injury with major loss of function, or persistent numbness also needs timely medical assessment.

This article provides education and does not replace an individual medical evaluation, diagnosis, or treatment recommendation.

References

1 Amin NH, Kumar NS, Schickendantz MS. Medial epicondylitis: evaluation and management. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2015;23(6):348–355. [Google Scholar]
2 Dumusc A, Zufferey P. Elbow tendinopathy. Revue Médicale Suisse. 2015;11(465):591–595. [Google Scholar]
3 Prabhakar G, Kanawade V, Ghali AN, Dutta AK, Brady CI, Morrey BF. Medial elbow pain syndrome: current treatment strategies. Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):e81–e88. [Google Scholar]
4 Laratta J, Caldwell JM, Lombardi J, Levine W, Ahmad C. Evaluation of common elbow pathologies: a focus on physical examination. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 2017;45(2):184–190. [Google Scholar]
5 Tahir A, Chanian N, Tiwana S, Sahu MA, Blackwell J. Medial epicondylitis: a review of clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management in the United Kingdom. Cureus. 2026;18(1):e102264. [Google Scholar]
6 See ZH, Loo CE, Jaafar Z. Eccentric exercise therapy for medial epicondylitis: a systematic review of clinical outcomes. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 2026;98:103364. [Google Scholar]
7 Stahl S, Kaufman T. The efficacy of an injection of steroids for medial epicondylitis. A prospective study of sixty elbows. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 1997;79(11):1648–1652. [Google Scholar]
8 Abate M, Salini V, Schiavone C, Andia I. Clinical benefits and drawbacks of local corticosteroids injections in tendinopathies. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2017;16(3):341–349. [Google Scholar]
9 Bohlen HL, Schwartz ZE, Wu VJ, Thon SG, Finley ZJ, O’Brien MJ, Savoie FH III. Platelet-rich plasma is an equal alternative to surgery in the treatment of type 1 medial epicondylitis. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020;8(3):2325967120908952. [Google Scholar]
10 Alzahrani WM. Platelet-rich plasma injections as an alternative to surgery in treating patients with medial epicondylitis: a systematic review. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e28378. [Google Scholar]
11 Nguyen CT, Lee MH, Kaufman MW, Meng Y, Koduri JA, Abrams G, Cheung EV, Freehill MT, Roh EY. Minimally invasive needle tenotomy vs. platelet rich plasma injection in the treatment of chronic elbow epicondylitis. JSES International. 2025;9(1):231–236. Published online August 28, 2024. [Google Scholar]
12 Hauser RA, Hauser MA, Holian P. Hackett-Hemwall dextrose Prolotherapy for unresolved elbow pain. Practical Pain Management. 2009;9(8):14–26. [Google Scholar]
13 Barakat A, Jha G, Raval P, Abourisha E, Divall P, Singh HP, Pandey R. Systematic review of surgical techniques for medial epicondylitis: evaluating the impact of preoperative injections and concomitant ulnar neuritis on postoperative outcomes. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 2025;107(7):457–468. [Google Scholar]
14 Poolton JT, Minett J, Kazmi A. Surgical treatment for medial epicondyle tendinopathy: a systematic literature review. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 2025;91(4):429–438. [Google Scholar]